Rubriques
Dernières notes
Archives
Liens
Les derniers articles du site de l'ACEP
-
L'intégration des politiques budgétaires : un enjeu majeur pour le couple franco-allemand
22/06/2010 16:56 - Alain Fabre -
Biologie synthétique: copier ou créer la vie ?
22/06/2010 16:19 - Propos recueillis par Pierre GRANIER
Dans nos blogs
Notes
Gaza was Aflame: But What Now?
Samedi 31 Janvier 2009
dr harry hagopian
My soul cries alas for thee,
O my land,
With a sigh like the blaze of a conflagration
My soul cries alas for thee,
O mine of excellences,
With a sigh
That makes me bite my thumb
My soul cries alas for thee,
O my land,
With a sigh like the blaze of a conflagration
My soul cries alas for thee,
O mine of excellences,
With a sigh
That makes me bite my thumb
Notes
Goodbye President Bush!
Vendredi 16 Janvier 2009
George W Bush, the 43rd president of the USA, gave his final conference to the White House press corps today in which he made a rather robust defence of his eight-year legacy. Defiant at times, reflective and even funny at others, the president still maintained his overall political viewpoint despite the fact that he enjoys the lowest approval ratings since the history of polls.
However, President Bush also admitted - albeit somewhat airily - to some ‘disappointments’ or even ‘mistakes’ during his two terms in the White House. The image of a president standing warrior-like aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on 1 May 2003 with a Mission Accomplished banner behind him was a mistake, for instance, as was the infamy of the Abu Ghreib prison tortures. However, one was left with the clear impression that President Bush still believed firmly that historians will give him a more favourable by-line once the dust has settled and he has eclipsed to his ranch in Texas.
To many men and women, no matter in whichever continent of the world, President Bush has been an unfortunate mishap who failed quite early in his presidency to lead his nation and was hijacked after 9/11 by the neo-conservative ideology of the Cheneys, Roves, Rumsfelds, et al of Washington DC. In fact, his fumbling watch included major wars such as in Iraq and Afghanistan, saw the Middle East - and more specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - ricochet wildly into alarming stasis or bloody violence and ended with the biggest financial disaster since 1937 and possibly even 1929.
I have written consistently against the Iraqi war, not because I was a supporter of a cruel dictator who butchered his way into power and well beyond, but because the grounds for this war were highly questionable in both legal and strategic terms. What weapons of mass destruction? As Hans Blink, the UN arms inspector, admitted publicly, those weapons were a dodgy pretext for an ideological war with nefarious global consequences. Iraq is littered with the graves of those who died since the invasion began in 2003, as are the US military cemeteries itself. It is quite true that there are at least as many graves - largely of Kurdish and Shi’i Iraqis - that were inhumed by Saddam Hussein but surely two wrongs do not make a right, do they?
However, I admit with relief that the situation has improved substantially on the ground in Iraq since the surge ordered by President Bush in early 2007. After all, the violence has diminished quite noticeably in most governorates, the Sofa will in all likelihood lead to a methodical drawdown of US troops in Iraq in such a way that president-elect Barrack Obama will not be boxed into an impossible corner, our own British troops will have left Basra by next summer, and Baghdad just witnessed the symbolic handover of the Green Zone to the Iraqi flag and the opening of the US and other embassies in Baghdad.
So in some sense, things seem to be shuffling ahead in Iraq, though not elsewhere in Gaza where the US Administration has been an obstruction rather than a solution to the warfare or even in Lebanon where a distressing lack of clarity persists over the parliamentary elections. However, two observations come to the fore. The first is that such a reduction in violence seems largely contingent upon the presence of those numbers of US troops. I wonder if this might still be the case once those troops have left the country, whether in 2011 or at another date. In fact, this is when we might well realise that democracy was not injected by President Bush into the region. After all, a healthy democracy in the Arab World has to grow from within society, but it can only do so if the efforts of its proponents were not constantly squelched and if they were not censored, harassed or imprisoned by their leaders or post-colonial masterminds simply for aspiring toward democratic values.
The other observation is that the policies exported by President Bush through a coterie of ideological (and therefore, by definition, dangerous) advisers has also made our world more unsafe. Why? Simply because his ill-advised policies have fomented further the kind of Ben Laden-image and al-Qa’eda-clone prototype of violence, radicalism and fanaticism. Here is a president who chose to open a series of Pandora boxes that provided its dangerous protagonists and unhinged choreographs with spurious pretexts to enhance their levels of global blackmail, violence and terror. Would the less injudicious and more ‘presidential’ way not have been to chart a course that dealt with real terrorism rather than chase ideological bogeys?
With a selective approach to democracy, and a legacy of extraordinary renditions and Guantanamo-like jurisdictions, I view with disfavour the policies of the outgoing president who has demoted America’s central role as a beacon of democracy and decency, of lofty values, of freedom of expression and human rights. As for Iraq, I appreciate the joy felt by its citizens upon their liberation from a vile despot. But did they truly gain democracy? Or will the power plays between the three main communities with their incinerating sectarianism prove to be their undoing and lead toward further ructions? Or could Iraqis learn from history and shelve their own interests for the sake of the larger good of their great country as a whole?
Goodbye President Bush! Welcome President-Elect Obama. Good luck to Iraq, and to the Middle East, in 2009.
However, President Bush also admitted - albeit somewhat airily - to some ‘disappointments’ or even ‘mistakes’ during his two terms in the White House. The image of a president standing warrior-like aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on 1 May 2003 with a Mission Accomplished banner behind him was a mistake, for instance, as was the infamy of the Abu Ghreib prison tortures. However, one was left with the clear impression that President Bush still believed firmly that historians will give him a more favourable by-line once the dust has settled and he has eclipsed to his ranch in Texas.
To many men and women, no matter in whichever continent of the world, President Bush has been an unfortunate mishap who failed quite early in his presidency to lead his nation and was hijacked after 9/11 by the neo-conservative ideology of the Cheneys, Roves, Rumsfelds, et al of Washington DC. In fact, his fumbling watch included major wars such as in Iraq and Afghanistan, saw the Middle East - and more specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - ricochet wildly into alarming stasis or bloody violence and ended with the biggest financial disaster since 1937 and possibly even 1929.
I have written consistently against the Iraqi war, not because I was a supporter of a cruel dictator who butchered his way into power and well beyond, but because the grounds for this war were highly questionable in both legal and strategic terms. What weapons of mass destruction? As Hans Blink, the UN arms inspector, admitted publicly, those weapons were a dodgy pretext for an ideological war with nefarious global consequences. Iraq is littered with the graves of those who died since the invasion began in 2003, as are the US military cemeteries itself. It is quite true that there are at least as many graves - largely of Kurdish and Shi’i Iraqis - that were inhumed by Saddam Hussein but surely two wrongs do not make a right, do they?
However, I admit with relief that the situation has improved substantially on the ground in Iraq since the surge ordered by President Bush in early 2007. After all, the violence has diminished quite noticeably in most governorates, the Sofa will in all likelihood lead to a methodical drawdown of US troops in Iraq in such a way that president-elect Barrack Obama will not be boxed into an impossible corner, our own British troops will have left Basra by next summer, and Baghdad just witnessed the symbolic handover of the Green Zone to the Iraqi flag and the opening of the US and other embassies in Baghdad.
So in some sense, things seem to be shuffling ahead in Iraq, though not elsewhere in Gaza where the US Administration has been an obstruction rather than a solution to the warfare or even in Lebanon where a distressing lack of clarity persists over the parliamentary elections. However, two observations come to the fore. The first is that such a reduction in violence seems largely contingent upon the presence of those numbers of US troops. I wonder if this might still be the case once those troops have left the country, whether in 2011 or at another date. In fact, this is when we might well realise that democracy was not injected by President Bush into the region. After all, a healthy democracy in the Arab World has to grow from within society, but it can only do so if the efforts of its proponents were not constantly squelched and if they were not censored, harassed or imprisoned by their leaders or post-colonial masterminds simply for aspiring toward democratic values.
The other observation is that the policies exported by President Bush through a coterie of ideological (and therefore, by definition, dangerous) advisers has also made our world more unsafe. Why? Simply because his ill-advised policies have fomented further the kind of Ben Laden-image and al-Qa’eda-clone prototype of violence, radicalism and fanaticism. Here is a president who chose to open a series of Pandora boxes that provided its dangerous protagonists and unhinged choreographs with spurious pretexts to enhance their levels of global blackmail, violence and terror. Would the less injudicious and more ‘presidential’ way not have been to chart a course that dealt with real terrorism rather than chase ideological bogeys?
With a selective approach to democracy, and a legacy of extraordinary renditions and Guantanamo-like jurisdictions, I view with disfavour the policies of the outgoing president who has demoted America’s central role as a beacon of democracy and decency, of lofty values, of freedom of expression and human rights. As for Iraq, I appreciate the joy felt by its citizens upon their liberation from a vile despot. But did they truly gain democracy? Or will the power plays between the three main communities with their incinerating sectarianism prove to be their undoing and lead toward further ructions? Or could Iraqis learn from history and shelve their own interests for the sake of the larger good of their great country as a whole?
Goodbye President Bush! Welcome President-Elect Obama. Good luck to Iraq, and to the Middle East, in 2009.
Notes
The Middle East Turns to Page 2009!
Jeudi 8 Janvier 2009Almost ten days ago, I decided to write a piece highlighting the major shifts of the Middle East in 2008, with particular emphasis on the three hotspots of Israel-Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq. I wanted to mention the upcoming parliamentary elections of 7th June in Lebanon that are contributing to a further cleavage of the country into two almost equal but diametrically opposite political forces as well as heightening sectarian tensions to a new pitch despite significant efforts by a plucky president trying to keep his country together. I also wanted to comment on the future of Iraq now that the Sofa has somewhat shifted the dynamics on the ground, created new facts or zones already and provided a less diffident glimpse of the possible future orientations of an incoming Obama Administration.
We are short of rooms and supplies, we are up to our necks ... The buildings are falling on the heads of the patients
Ramez Zyara, a surgeon at Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza
Ramez Zyara, a surgeon at Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza
Notes
O Little Town of Bethlehem 2008 - Verbum caro factum est
Dimanche 4 Janvier 2009
Some two millennia ago, Bethlehem witnessed the miraculous birth of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ when the Word became flesh and made His dwelling amongst us for the salvation of humankind. This new faith we know as Christianity started in a lowly manger, in a small, deprived and unassuming town under Roman occupation, and led some three decades later to the glorious chapter of the Resurrection in nearby Jerusalem.
Today, Bethlehem with its Nativity Basilica, its Manger Square and falafel stalls, still marks this history. However, has the situation improved, and is Bethlehem, celebrated in so many Christmas carols, any more peaceful and merry today?
Throughout the past year, Palestinians across the West Bank and Gaza have suffered in varying degrees as a result of the political realignments of our global world. Whether in terms of a painful economy, degrading political circumstances, snaking separation walls, bellicose internecine feuds or merely discrimination by one group against another, or one faith against the other, 2008 has at times been another year of fading hope and escalating suffering.
However, our Christian faith teaches us to be resolute and hopeful, and to look for those signs of hope that inject optimism into our moments of justifiable pessimism. A very tall order, I must admit, when many Palestinians are worried about their daily food and movement, but I personally can never abandon the promise that the gloom of Good Friday only leads to the glory of Easter. After all, Bethlehem heralded a saviour, and led us to the empty tomb.
This is why I join today with all Palestinians - whether Christian or Muslim - in Bethlehem, Beit Jala, Beit Sahur as much as in the rest of the Holy Land in wishing them the joyful peace that is an ultimate reward for their steadfastness and resourcefulness. Yes, it has to be a joy, even if it feels untrue and ephemeral, despite the sacrifices and hardships, or the dark clouds hovering above their families, despite Israeli settlements and expropriations, or Palestinian feuds and tensions. The joy that comes from within cannot be vanquished, it cannot be suffocated and quashed, and remains a formidable tool not only for self-edification but also as a challenge against all aggressors. As the Christmas carol O Come, O Come, Emmanuel reminds us, the light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it!
On my own behalf, as well as on behalf of those Christian constituencies I am privileged to work with, I recognise with humility and admiration the courage of Palestinian Christians in Bethlehem. I wish them, and all those tourists visiting them during this holy season, ‘eid milad majeed, sa’eed wa moubarak in the faith-centred hope that the Mystery of the Incarnation will help lift up their spirits and lead them toward better harmony and an eventual peace with justice. This is a tough wish, almost an impossible one some would add, but who said that our faith should be an easy one?
www.epektasis.net
Today, Bethlehem with its Nativity Basilica, its Manger Square and falafel stalls, still marks this history. However, has the situation improved, and is Bethlehem, celebrated in so many Christmas carols, any more peaceful and merry today?
Throughout the past year, Palestinians across the West Bank and Gaza have suffered in varying degrees as a result of the political realignments of our global world. Whether in terms of a painful economy, degrading political circumstances, snaking separation walls, bellicose internecine feuds or merely discrimination by one group against another, or one faith against the other, 2008 has at times been another year of fading hope and escalating suffering.
However, our Christian faith teaches us to be resolute and hopeful, and to look for those signs of hope that inject optimism into our moments of justifiable pessimism. A very tall order, I must admit, when many Palestinians are worried about their daily food and movement, but I personally can never abandon the promise that the gloom of Good Friday only leads to the glory of Easter. After all, Bethlehem heralded a saviour, and led us to the empty tomb.
This is why I join today with all Palestinians - whether Christian or Muslim - in Bethlehem, Beit Jala, Beit Sahur as much as in the rest of the Holy Land in wishing them the joyful peace that is an ultimate reward for their steadfastness and resourcefulness. Yes, it has to be a joy, even if it feels untrue and ephemeral, despite the sacrifices and hardships, or the dark clouds hovering above their families, despite Israeli settlements and expropriations, or Palestinian feuds and tensions. The joy that comes from within cannot be vanquished, it cannot be suffocated and quashed, and remains a formidable tool not only for self-edification but also as a challenge against all aggressors. As the Christmas carol O Come, O Come, Emmanuel reminds us, the light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it!
On my own behalf, as well as on behalf of those Christian constituencies I am privileged to work with, I recognise with humility and admiration the courage of Palestinian Christians in Bethlehem. I wish them, and all those tourists visiting them during this holy season, ‘eid milad majeed, sa’eed wa moubarak in the faith-centred hope that the Mystery of the Incarnation will help lift up their spirits and lead them toward better harmony and an eventual peace with justice. This is a tough wish, almost an impossible one some would add, but who said that our faith should be an easy one?
www.epektasis.net
HH
Rédigé par HH le Dimanche 4 Janvier 2009 à 15:36
